Author: sg4vo

Frito-Lay recalled some 13-ounce bags of Lay’s Classic Potato Chips on December 16 because they contained unreported milk, which is dangerous for people who have milk allergies or sensitivities. The company looked into the recall and acted right away after receiving a consumer alert. Specifics of the Recall A few retail and online retailers in Oregon and Washington received the impacted products. These chips might have been bought by customers as early as November 3, 2024. Customers should search for the following information in order to identify the affected bags: Customers who are allergic to milk are advised by Frito-Lay to throw away these chips right away in order to prevent allergic reactions. Although there haven’t been any reported allergic reactions thus far, the business advises being cautious to be safe. In a statement to Newsweek, a Frito-Lay representative confirmed the recall and emphasized the company’s commitment to consumer protection and transparency. The representative also made it clear that the recall does not affect any other Lay’s products, such as those with different flavors, sizes, or variety packs. During regular business hours, impacted consumers can reach Frito-Lay’s Consumer Relations team at 1-800-352-4477 for more assistance. FDA Strengthens Recall Alert In… CONTINUE READING…

On a sunny New Orleans morning, 75-year-old Elis decided to shake things up. Tired of the routine expectations that come with age, she made a decision that many would consider daring – she got a tattoo. She wanted to feel young, spirited, and alive, opting for a design that symbolized her resilience and zest for life. As she admired the artwork on her arm, she felt empowered. For her, this was a bold message: age was merely a number. Facing Unexpected Backlash Eager to share her new tattoo, Elis invited her family over, excited to see their reactions. Yet, the response was far from what she had hoped. Her daughter’s face showed clear disapproval. “Mom, what on earth were you thinking?” she exclaimed. “At your age, getting a tattoo is not just inappropriate; it’s downright embarrassing. You’re supposed to be a dignified grandmother, not some rebellious teenager. People will laugh at you.” If that wasn’t hurtful enough, her son-in-law, whom she had always treated with love, broke into fits of laughter. His reaction left Elis feeling humiliated and wounded. But instead of wallowing, she found herself resolved – this would not go unanswered. Crafting the Perfect Payback Elis, determined to… CONTINUE READING…

Sen. Tom Cotton Demands Investigation After West Point’s False Statement About Defense Nominee Senator Tom Cotton has criticized West Point for providing false information to ProPublica about Pete Hegseth, the nominee for Secretary of Defense. Initially, the academy claimed Hegseth never applied to West Point, but records show he was accepted in 1999 as part of the Class of 2003, though he ultimately chose not to attend. In a letter to Superintendent Lt. Gen. Steven Gilland, Cotton described the situation as “concerning,” accusing the academy of either gross negligence or outright dishonesty. Cotton noted the statement may have violated Hegseth’s rights under the Privacy Act of 1974 by sharing personal information with the media. He demanded a full investigation into how the error occurred and why it was shared with what he called a “left-wing outlet” in a political “hit piece.” The Army has since issued an apology, acknowledging the mistake as an “administrative error” that occurred after an employee reviewed incomplete records. A spokesperson confirmed, “Mr. Hegseth was offered admission to West Point in 1999 but did not attend. We take this situation very seriously and deeply regret the error.” Hegseth has since addressed the controversy and his nomination… CONTINUE READING…

A tragic event on a Wisconsin farm claimed the lives of 29-year-old farmer Michael Biadasz and 16 cattle due to gas poisoning. The incident occurred when unusual weather conditions created a “deadly dome of air” in a manure holding tank, trapping toxic gases. Michael’s father, Bob Biadasz, explained that although the tank had been safely emptied in the past, this rare combination of factors proved fatal. In honor of Michael, the Biadasz family displayed tractors and farm machinery along the road leading to the farm. This tragedy has prompted calls for stricter regulations on manure holding tanks to prevent similar accidents. The National Agriculture Safety Database stresses the need for proper ventilation and clear warning signs in livestock areas, emphasizing the importance of safety measures for both workers and animals. This incident highlights the perilous risks faced by farmers and the urgent need for preventive action.

The United States Military Academy West Point has recently come under fire for giving false information to a journalist attempting to write a critical piece about President-elect Donald Trump’s selection for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.  Many have since spoken out against the prestigious institution calling for those involved in the incident to be held accountable. For context, a journalist with the outlet ProPublica had reached out to West Point to verify claims Hegseth had previously made, claiming to have been accepted at the military academy.  In response, the university responded, claiming that its records indicated that Hegseth had never even applied.  However, Hegseth eventually shared his West Point acceptance letter from 1999, giving concrete proof that his claims were accurate. Subsequently, conservatives on social media sounded off on West Point over the false information.  “Officials at the U.S. Military Academy should not be feeding lies to left-wing reporters about President Trump’s nominees,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) said on X. “West Point needs to thoroughly investigate this egregiously bad judgement and potential violation of the Privacy Act immediately.” on the response to the attempted hit piece about him. “We understand that ProPublica (the Left Wing hack group) is planning to publish a… CONTINUE READING…

In a majority opinion written by Judge E. Trenton Brown issued on Thursday, December 19, the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled that Fulton Country District Attorney Fani Willis is disqualified from prosecuting former president and current President-elect Donald J Trump, citing the appearance of impropriety in Willis’s prosecution of Trump. As background, Willis brought a case against Trump and over a dozen of his 2020 campaign and legal staff, arguing that they committed election interference in 2020. However, Trump and a number of his co-defendants challenged Willis over her romantic relationship with Nathan Wade, one of her prosecutors in the case, arguing that Willis financially benefitted from the relationship because of trips they took together. In any case, in the opinion, Judge Brown said, that the trial court was incorrect when it decided not to disqualify Fani Willis from the case, though it did disqualify Nathan Wade. Judge Brown wrote, “After carefully considering the trial court’s findings in its order, we conclude that it erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office,” Continuing, Judge Brown then noted that there was enough of an appearance of impropriety to demolish the public’s faith in the judicial system, meaning that the… CONTINUE READING…

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle recently shared a new photo of their children, Archie and Lilibet, as part of their holiday card. The image shows the children walking towards their parents, who are smiling with open arms. Fans were excited to see how much Archie and Lilibet have grown, especially noting their red hair. However, the photo quickly sparked online speculation. Some users claimed it had been manipulated, pointing out supposed “digitally altered outlines” and suggesting that elements, such as the dogs, were “superimposed.” Critics also commented on the photo’s lighting and Meghan’s appearance, claiming it looked “staged” or overly polished. Experts have stated it’s difficult to determine if the photo was edited due to its small size. Some believe the image was retouched, which is common for holiday cards, but no clear evidence of manipulation has been found. Despite the controversy, Harry and Meghan continue to limit the number of public photos of their children, focusing on protecting their privacy and security.